Wednesday 2 October 2013

Six Books for the Journey Introduction


Six Books for the Journey, run by the Team Vicar of All Saints and St Peters, Rev Simon Tillotson

All at the Vicarage CT5 1PG (opposite 48 Church Street) at 7.30pm on Tuesdays.

Please if possible do not read the books beforehand! These are introductory talks about the books in an encouragement for you to read one or two of them after the course. The information in the courses will be helpful in their own right without you needing to read the books.

Email  Simon at tillotsons@gmail.com or call him on 01227 272308 if you are intending to come along

- Richard Rohr "Falling Upward"  published SPCK 2011

 

- Befriending our Desires - Philip Sheldrake  DLT 2001

 

-    God Lost and Found by John Pritchard  - SPCK 2011

 

- The Lost Message of Jesus – Steve Chalke published 2003 Zondervan

 

- Spiritual masters for All Seasons by Michael Ford published Hidden Spring 2009

 

 -   Summons to Life – Martin Israel – The search for identity through the Spiritual

 

This is a meditative and thought provoking course. You may wish to visit the links on the top right hand side of this page to read the subject matter for each evening in advance. This will help you prepare for the evening and aid you in your thinking, and it will probably help the discussion too. But it is not essential. Please let me Simon know if you are intending to come. Even if you only come to one evening that is fine. You don't have to compete the whole course as I realise how busy everyone is.
 

Wednesday 29 May 2013

Book 6 -  Summons to Life – Martin Israel – The search for identity through the Spiritual

 

Very similar to previous material in this course but some new insights too

 

He believes the soul is underneath the ego which often displaces it. We need to find our souls.

 

“The main attributes of the soul are its all-embracing nature and its freedom within a vast range. Unlike the ego of the existential self, it is never alone or in isolation, but is in wordless communion with all other souls and with the power that transcends and infuses the world. The sould does not seek for itself alone; it is never selfish. Its joy is the joy of all the creation, and it is complete only when the world world has moved into completion.

A body vibrant with life is a joy to behold. It speaks of a soul in command. Not surprisingly, a soul-infused body is seen most often in little children. Subsequent experience soon dulls the soul’s light and darkens the body and the mind unless love is also give to the child.”

 

On the subject of our identity and our need for worldly acquisition

“When we live in the enclosure of the personal, or existential self we are bound to circumstances. Our lives are controlled by outer events and inner bodily and emotional disquietude. Our actions depend on the affairs that are deep within us. There is no freedom of inner choice, only a makeshift selection of possible responses to an overwhelming external presence that menaces us. When we live in the consciousness of the personal self, we work only to survive, but survival has the sole virtue of delaying death with its apparent annihilation of all we know. This is not the life that man was destined to lead. He has fallen from his high place in the hierarchy of nature. He has quitted his birthright, and has sacrificed his leadership of the world in order to gain comfort through possessions. The more insecure we are, the more we need to possess, to own, to master intellectually and emotionally. The freer we are in security, the less need have we for possessions, and the more aware are we of a constant relationship with the outside world that is consecrated to a mutual concern that unites commitment with freedom. The more I need to have, the less I am. The less concerned I am about my attributes and the more I flow out from the soul to the world, he richer I am. I am no longer merely myself: I embrace the other also as it embraces me.”

 

The Spirit leads us into the truth about ourselves

 

“The Spirit leads us into the truth about ourselves. When we are divested of personal craving, the spirit, which is of God, directs the whole personality Godward, but in the early stages of our awareness, when selfishness is uppermost, the power of the spirit is perverted into paths of self-seeking and aggrandisement. The path of man to the recognition of his spirit is the spiritual path, and spirituality is the movement of the personality to God. To move into spiritual reality is man’s true end in life, for only in such reality is man authentic. To be oneself fully and gloriously is the greatest joy you can know, for at last you are free. This freedom is gained at a heavy price, but only when you are free can you enjoy your own being as well as the world around you.” P.14

 

We need to move from the self-centred love to the God-centred life. This journey takes a whole lifetime.

“The love that identifies each person as something unique and valuable in his own right is a love that strives for the survival of that person and that works for his own growth into fullness of being. In the early stages of life this love is experienced from outside, and is the true intimation of love. It always comes first to us. If we know of love and are sure we are cared for, we have a direct proof that we matter as people, and therefore that our identity is real. Of course, this view of identity is still superficial and simple. It is a selfish view based on the conception that we are all-important, and that the concern of those about us should revolve around us. Such self-centredness is the natural awareness of the contented child. He is also in inner communion with nature around him. This is a glorious state, but also a primitive one. It belongs more to our animal inheritance than our human destiny. Why is it inadequate? Because it depends entirely on the equable disposition of the outside world, and it can be destroyed in a single moment by a change in those outside circumstances. It is man’s work on himself that is to bring him into a communion with all things that can never be destroyed. To know peace in chaos, joy in suffering, immortality in death, is the destiny of a fully realised man. This work brings us into union with Him who is the Master, the Overseer, of the worl, Whom we know as God.” P 17

 

Adversity brings us more in touch with our “true being”

“The realisation of your true identity consists primarily in detaching yourself from those attributes that are superficial but which you, in your blind ignorance, consider essential to your being. In other words, the movement towards the real is first and foremost a  progressive stripping from yourself of illusions. This stripping is never really voluntary. It comes to us through those events we call tragedies, or at the very least, disappointments. We would not seek the real, the unchangeable, the reliable, if we could live happily in the world of illusion with all its glamour and false security. But the course of life is punctuated by episodes, not infrequently of long duration, in which those things we have held dear are taken from us. It may be the wealth of a rich man, or the life of one who is dear to us, or our health, or even our reputation. It may be the work that sustained us, or even a special gift on which we relied. In some people’s lives there has been very little experience of love. It might be thought therefore that such people would be incapable of giving love or even of recognising it, and yet this very dereliction can serve a purpose in directing the person’s attention to his true condition.

It is far worse to live an anonymous life, even on the crest of a wave of material success and affluence, than to be aware of your true identity though in a state of destitution. In this latter contingency you are at least down to bare essentials, and the rock of true being is the foundation stone of a new life. The role of suffering in the growth of personality cannot be over-emphasised, but it all depends on the view one has about suffering and how best it should be confronted.

It is no use telling someone who is in severe distress that it is all useful experience for the growth of his own soul. Years can be spent in fighting against a multitude of misfortunes, and one’s life can ultimately expire with the mumbled cursing of the personality against the whole cosmic process. Yet such a process may be nearer the great discovery of his own true being than one who is shielded against adversity by pleasant outer circumstances. The key to the disclosure of inner reality is always the tacit admission that we of ourselves can do nothing, that the process of our intellects comes to a humiliating halt, and that we are creatures of darkness surrounded by an even denser obscurity. It is the courage to admit our ignorance and impotence that is the key which opens a new dimension of reality to us. No wonder God told Dame Julian of Norwich that sin is necessary but that finally all will be well.” P.19

 

Experiences of the awareness of the presence of God

 

“The awareness of God is not the completion of the spiritual path. It is merely an important milestone along it. We progress in life by faith that the better will prevail against the worse and that life will triumph over death. Often our faith is sorely taxed, but we persist, driven as much by the body’s desire to survive as by the soul’s hidden will to meaning. At last, often when we are strained to the limits of our endurance, or sometimes when we are in great peace, He comes to us, and the way to meaning is revealed.

Whatever is said about God is wrong, for He transcends all categories so that even a compendium of every virtue wold belittle Him. Though the Godhead is beyond human imagining, yet He comes to us as a person among persons, until He has lifted us out of our own enclosed personality so that we may begin to have a mature intimation of his full nature. God is known to us in the experience of our own souls. Without that experience, He is merely an intellectural hypothesis or a theological construction. It is His manifestation to us that brings us closer to Him, and the validity of that experience is judged by the degree of proximity that flows between Him and us.”

 

Gradually faith becomes personal

 

“Faith, once hidden and obscure, is now illuminated by hope that springs from this gift of love. I am loved for what I am, and my sins are forgiven me. This does not mean that the past and all its consequences cease to exist, but rather that they are no longer facts of imprisonment and condemnation.” P 25

 

Against narrow fundamentalism

 

“When the experience of God’s love comes to someone at the emotional peak of a revivalistic meeting in which sin is loudly denounced and lamented, the release from the spiritual bondage of his special sin may easily lead the person to believe that this forgiveness is dependent on a rigid theological position that must be dogmatically upheld at all costs. Thus God’s grace is conditional on our acceptance on Him in terms of a particular religious insight or tradition. The result of this is that the vision of God may easily be transformed into an imprisoning proposition that cuts one off from the body of mankind, and separates one into a small class of the elect, or the “saved”. This is where an understanding of the love of God and His providence in the world is so important. God’s revelation of Himself to us is progressive. Indeed, in Christian terms it is the Holy Spirit that is lead us into all truth.

This progressive revelation by the Holy Spirit, Who is deep within us in the spirit of the soul, leads us into an ever-deepening awareness of the divinity that lies at the heart of all creation and was supremely revealed in the juxtaposition of God and man in the incarnational event. But if we are ever unwise enough to believe that we have the whole answer to God’s being, we at once shut Him out of our lives, replacing Him with an idol, which may be theological, ritual or intellectual, and which ultimately degenerates into a superstition.” P 26

 

The dynamics of true salvation – a gradual process

“True salvation is to be seen as the healing of the whole person. This means an integration of the personality so that the body, reasoning mind, and emotional nature are working under the conscious direction of the soul, which is itself illuminated by the Spirit, Who is God immanent. This salvation is a slow but progressive process. It is punctuated by many episodes of failure and apparent regression, which in turn are the portals of entry for God’s mysterious grace which reveals new aspects of the divine love to us. Thus the first experience of God’s personal presence is followed by a penetration of the darkness that is both of the world and in our unconscious minds.” P 27

 

Journey of the abundant life involves integration between subconscious and conscious self

“The abundant life depends first on a progressive recognition of the material in the unconscious and then its active integration in the conscious life of the person. The pain experienced in this journey of self-discovery is often very great but when it is almost too great too great to bear, the love of God breaks into our consciousness, showing us more of the divine reality. It is in this way that the personality is resurrected” p 28

 

 

 

Stillness and meditation leads to love of others

“It is only when we know the love of God that comes in the stillness that we can flow out in that stillness to another person. When we know that peace and can bequeath it to another, we are beginning to love that person very deeply.”  P.33

 

Marriages can be crippling affairs that do not allow the individuality to breath

“Unfortunately, not all lovers experience this fullness of relationship. Many become so attached to one another that each life is lost in the other, and there is no growth into maturity. They are certainly in love with each other, but also chained in an attachment that leaves neither free. A selfishness extends from one person to encompass the two in close union, and the rest of the world is of no account to them. In due course one of the partners must die, and then the other is left disconsolate.” P 37

 

Romantic disappointment often leads to the divine earch.

“Even the romantic love of youth is a gateway to the divine. But it is the frustration, the disappointment, of this personal attraction, that first makes many people open to the unfailing love of God. He comes to us when we are broken, and He mends the personality within us. The gratitude we evince and the depth of understanding with which we are now endowed help us to feel into the sufferings of others. Thus does compassion develop.” P 41

 

Relationships and especially marriages are places where the personality is tested

“It is uncommon to find husband and wife relating to each other in such a way that each is completely free and realising his (or her) full potentialities as a person. It is much more frequent for one to submerge the drive for growth in order to accommodate between the other. The same applies in the family where there is tension between parents and children, or in working life where here is disharmony between different grades of employees or between employer and employee.

None of this is necessarily bad, nor is the judgement all in favour of the one against the other. The sharp distinction between black and white is an attitude of immaturity. The purpose of living is to penetrate ever more deeply into the lives and characters of other people, not in order to judge or change them but to learn more about oneself. You learn half this lesson during periods of solitude when you are thrown back on our own resources, and the other half when you are responding to various assaults of the outside world, which in practice means confrontations with other people. And the final goal is to be able to love those people and the whole created universe around you.” P 44

 

 

 

He who knows God does not need the approbation of men

“He who knows God in the height of his being no longer needs the propitiation and approbation of men. Instead he has their love, for he no longer demands it but rather flows out in love to them. It may take years of patient endeavour in constant prayer to reach this state of unconditional forgiveness, but when it is attained, we are changed. We have known God face to face. A new view of reality is cleared in front of us.” P.47

“When we consecrate our souls to God, He tests them in the purifying fire of experience. It is very often that the aspirant, after his first glimpse of God, is cast down in the mire of tragedy. All the stable connections from which he previously drew strength are withdrawn, and even his health may fail. The radiant light that drew him towards the greater world of reality dims, and all that is left is his own faith. This is the test of sincerity in the spiritual path, that we persist in our dedication to God when He appears to withdraw all his visible comforts from us. And do not imagine that this dark night of the soul, when all around us is the mist of obscurity, is merely an evanescent phase. It may go on indefinitely, or it may be punctuated by brief phases of bliss that are, in their turn, enveloped in a greater darkness. The measure of this darkness is the inability of the intellect to penetrate it. It is a void of blackness, and it is devoid even of emotional content.

In some instances the darkness can be related to unfavourable outer circumstances such as marital disharmony, ill health, or financial difficulties. But these are largely coincidental. It is tempting to blame one's inner dereliction on outer difficulties, but in fact these merely provide an excuse for leaving the great quest. We have to penetrate far deeper than the trivialities of worldly living if we are to transcend the darkness of the soul. There is, however, one bright spark of hope that remains during the test of aptitude, and this is a dim realisation of the fact that we have moved from the world of triviality and social usage to a numinous realm of unseen potentiality. What it embraces we cannot directly know at this stage, but in an inscrutable way it harmonises with the pulse of faith that is the inner manifestation of the soul's action. In other words, it is impossible to go back to where we were before the call to God inflamed the soul. If there is a great temptation to relapse to old ways and ends, the call has been spurious, and one has to retrace one's steps very carefully. But this state of affairs is unknown to those dedicated to the search for true life. The very darkness is a rest to the weary mind, and in it our earthly desires can find a welcome oblivion.” P.55 and 56

A growth into God is a growth away from submergence in the sufferings germane to one's own life or even of the world as a whole. This does not mean that we are lifted out of situations of suffering by a magical technique (some current schools of thought describe their practitioners as being "above" the pain of the world, though in fact an acquaintance with these people soon shows their personal inadequacy). The acceptance of suffering, neither in supine resignation nor in rebellious antipathy, is the measure of one's growth into God. If our proof of God depends on His success in alleviating pain and promoting worldly success, we know little of Him. We are, in fact, more likely to be in contact with suspect lower forces. The real evidence of God is the ability of the soul to rest in Him, no matter how terrible the outer circumstances appear. He is the darkness of the intellect and the dullness of the emotions, but He is also the light of the soul. When He is seen, the mind and emotions are still, quiet, and at rest, for a new organ of perception acclaims Him. The soul is revealed in its glory, and its organs of apprehension are active.

 

As the new revelation of divine grace is accepted and understood, so there is a subtle change in our consciousness, and a new way of life opens. The suffering of the present time, to use St. Paul's expression, is not to be compared with the glory that is to be revealed in us-and is being revealed every day as we move fearlessly into the unknown yet foreseen danger, not counting the cost but dedicating everything we have to Him Who gives us everything. If the farewell discourses of Jesus, written in the fourteenth to the seventeenth chapters of the Gospel according to St. John, are real in the light of His suffering on the cross, such suffering is seen to be the inevitable precursor of glorification. There is no glorification of the personality so that it is transfigured by the light of God, except through the refining fire of suffering.

 

The suffering that leads the soul to a heightened awareness of God is a part of the journey of the person to the light. This suffering is never actively sought nor is it exulted over. It has little relationship with the self-induced suffering that follows a selfish, ignorant, or reckless action. Such suffering, which is an inevitable sequel to a wrong action, may also lead on to a greater understanding of God's grace if one accepts it as a new adventure in living. But this type of travail is at the foot-hills of the mountain of transfiguration. It is only the start of the spiritual ascent, and its consummation is that experience of forgiveness that has already been touched on in connection with love. The suffering that is part of the spiritual life itself is an immersion of the soul into the darkness of the world, where it feels in its very core the hopelessness and dereliction of unredeemed mankind-and indeed all created things. These are all striving, even in their ignorance, for the inner perfection that is the person's intuitive knowledge of God, but they do not know where they are going. Yet even in the darkness of their ignorance God is in control, and He will lead them to enlightenment. It is the service of the aspirant, in partaking of this darkness and even in being one with it, to lead benighted mankind out of its isolated ignorance into the greater community of God. In the world's history it was the incarnate Christ who performed this function in His own time, and through the power of the Holy Spirit He continues in the lives of all those, of every religious denomination and of none, who dedicate themselves to the loving service of their fellow-men. These are the real Christians, whether or not they accept the name.

 

Any superficial approach to suffering which looks for its root in a wrong action in the past is quite inadequate. The most spiritual people it has been my privilege to know have had hard lives punctuated by much personal tribulation. And in every case this suffering, by being accepted, has raised them to that glory that was seen fully in the resurrected Christ.” P 53-56

 

Prosperity gospel theology is terrible!

“Nothing is calculated to diminish the stature of human personality more than a servile submission of our will to the presumed will of God, in the assurance that all will go well for provide we do as God wishes. Surely it is the divine will that man should grow into that fullness of being which was seen perfectly in the witness of Christ, in His life, ministry, passion and resurrection. Thus there can be only one real prayer of petition, that we may be led through the power of the Holy Spirit into every deeper communion with God. In other words, there is only one fully realised prayer: union of God and man so that there is a union in man of the human and divine natures as was made manifest in the incarnate Christ.” P. 75

“I would not seek thee had I not found thee” Pascal

 

 

 

 

Tuesday 28 May 2013


Book 5  - Spiritual masters for All Seasons by Michael Ford published Hidden Spring 2009

This book explores the work of Thomas Merton, Henri Nouwen, Anthony de Mello and John O’Donahue

We shall look at the first of these two in this introduction to the book

 

Dark Night of the Soul expert

 

“Thomas Merton was, then, one of the greatest exponents of the apophatic tradition in Christian spirituality, a guide to those who experience crises of faith and doubt in their lives. Echoing the mystical theology of St John of the Cross, Merton speaks of he “curtain of darkness, “ the “night of aridity and faith”, and the “power of an obscure love”. The Dark Night is a turning point on the spiritual journey as we are beckoned to move away from our safety and defences, beyond our limits and beyond ourselves. The way of faith involves travelling by night. The closer we get to God, the less our faith is diluted with the half-light of created images and concepts. The more obscure the path becomes, the greater the certainty. While the journey may cause anguish and doubt, it is in the deepest darkness that we possess God most fully. We are filled with God’s infinite light, which, to our own reasoning, seems like pure darkness”. P 27

 

“Merton realized that women and men could exist almost entirely at the superficial level without an awareness of the inner depths of their being. But there could be no real love of life unless it were orientated towards the discovery of one’s true, spiritual self, a process often hampered, if not blocked, by a perfunctory concentration on external joys and fears. But when the road toward interiority was opened up and people began to live in communion with the unknown in them, they would taste freedom.

As the core of Merton’s spirituality lies the distinction between our real and false selves. The false self is the identity we assume in order to function in society, the springboard of all our egocentric desires such as honour, power and knowledge. We expend our energies constructing this nothingness into something objectively real. If we take our masks to be our true faces, observes Merton, we will protect them with the bandages of pleasures and glory, even at the cost of violating our own truth. If we do not know who we are, it is because we live out the fantasies of what everyone else wants us to be. But the real self, toward which we should move, is a religious mystery known only in its entirety to God. The deep secrecy of our own being if often hidden from us by our own estimates or illusions of what we are. The way to find the real “world” is not about observing what is outside us but about discovering our inner ground. For that, says Merton, is where the world is first and foremost – in our deepest selves. It is not a visible, determined structure with fixed laws but a living and self-creating mystery of which we are all a part and to which we have our own unique doors.

 

 

Merton writes

“The only true joy on earth is to escape from the prison of our own false self and enter by love into union with Life who dwells and sings within the essence of every creature and in the core of our own souls. In His love we possess all things and enjoy fruition of them, finding Him in them all. And thus as we go about the world, everything we meet and everything we see and hear and touch, far from defiling, purifies us and plants in us something more of contemplation and of heaven. Short of this perfection, created things do not bring us joy but pain. Until we love God perfectly, everything in the world will be able to hurt us. And the greatest misfortune is to be dead to the pain they inflict on us, and not realise what it is””   p.29

 

“Merton encouraged people to listen to their inner voice and not imitate the behaviour of people around them. Merton’s life had been a love affair with God. Every now and then God did that, said Father Matthew. “He was a man of God and he realised how funny God was because he was just an ordinary man. There was nothing special about him”. P.29

 

Merton wrote much about prayer and the power of contemplation

“Contemplation is more than a consideration of abstract truths abou God, more even than affective meditation on the things we believe. It is awakening, enlightenment and the amazing intuitive grasp by which love gains certitude of God’s creative and dynamic intervention in our daily life. Hence contemplation does not simply “find” a clear idea of God and confine Him within the limits of that idea, and hold Him there as a prisoner to Whom it can always return. On the contrary, contemplation is carried away by Him into His own realm, His own mystery and His own freedom. It is a pure and virginal knowledge, poor in concepts, poorer still in reasoning, but able, by its very poverty and purity, to follow the Word “wherever He may go”.” P.33

 

Merton also wrote much about the importance of solitude, but a sort of solitude that brings you closer to God and to your fellow man and woman:

“Some men have perhaps become hermits with the thought that sanctity could only be attained by escape from other men. But the only justification for a life of deliberate solitude is the conviction that it will help you to love not only God but also other men. If you go into the desert merely to get away from people you dislike, you will find neither peace nor solitude; you will only isolate yourself with a tribe of devils.

Man seeks unity because he is the image of the One God. Unity implies solitude, and hence the need to be physically alone. But unity and solitude are not metaphysical isolation. He who isolates himself in order to enjoy a kind of independence in his egotistical and external self does not find unity at all, for he disintegrates into a multiplicity of conflicting passions and finally ends in confusion and total unreality. Solitude is not and never can be a narcisstic dialogue of the ego with itself.” P.37

 

Thomas Merton saw the secular,modern world as still having distinctly religious characteristics. He wrote this

“Businesses are in reality quasi-religious sects. When you go to work in one you embrace a new faith. And if they are really big business, you progress from faith to a kind of mystique. Belief in the product, preaching the product, in the end the product becomes the focus of a transcendental experience. Through “the product” one communes with the cast forces of life, nature, and history that are experienced in business. Why not face it? Advertising treats all products with the reverence and the seriousness due to sacraments.” P 40

 

Merton wrote: “The message of hope the contemplative offers you is…is not that you need to find your way through the jungle of language and problems that today surround God: but that whether you understand or not, God loves you , is present to you, lives in you, dwells in you, calls you, saves you, and offers you an understanding and light which are like nothing you ever found in books or heard in sermons. The contemplative has nothing to tell you except to reassure you and say that, if you dare to penetrate your own silence and risk the sharing of that solitude with the lonely other who seeks God through you, then you will truly recover the light and the capacity to understand what is beyond words and beyond explanations because it is too close to be explained: it is the intimate union in the depths of your own heart, of God’s Spirit and your own secret inmost self, so that you and He are in all truth One Spirit.” P 55

 

Rowan Williams writes how anti-semitism in the Middle Ages by the church to Jews was a projection of the church’s “shadow”

“In Conjectures, Merton is very aware of society’s scapegoating instinct. It would be fascinating to put him alongside someone like Rene Girard in analysis there but he does have that sense that we consistently deal with our problems by projection. He comments fascinatingly in Conjectures that the profound and violent anti-semitism of the early Middle Ages in the Western church went with a kind of adoption of an Old Testament view of what the church was – the church identifying itself as the chosen people of God, on the march, heavily armed. He uses that as a way of saying that we project onto others the unacceptable image that we are, in fact, inhabiting ourselves. We see in others the unacceptable image that we are, in fact, inhabiting ourselves. We see in others the unacceptable face of what we are. There is a great deal there for us think about. All that he wrote about the Cold War is connected with that kind of analysis of displacement, scapegoating, projection and the “mimetic quality of violence” to quote Girard. We are violent because we learn violence from the other and we go on mirroring that backward and forward to infinity if we are not broken out of it.” P 58

 

 

 

Rowan Williams also writes about how solitude for Merton was a way of discovering more about himself and can do the same for us

 

“Far from being an evasive term, solitude is all about coming to terms with a lot most people don’t want to see. Therefore solitude is the deepest kind of connection, a familiar paradox. I think what he is saying here is that we all need to be quiet enough to be subject to our own scrutiny. For Christian and non-Christian alike, this is an absolute lifeline of sanity in a world which often encourages us not to face what we don’t want to look at in ourselves and so gives us endless distractions to prevent that happening”. P 60

 

Henri Nouwen – Trusting the Heart

Nouwen decided to follow a team of South African trapeze artists for a series of European tours. He said he was struck by the courage of performers who danced in the air. The fliers lived dangerously until they were caught by the strong hands of their partners. It was a feat of trust.

As Nouwen observes “Before they can be caught, they must let go. They must brave the emptiness of space.

Living with this kind of willingness to let go is one of the greatest challenges we face. Whether it concerns a person, possession or personal reputation, in so many areas we hold on at all costs. We become heroic defenders of our dearly gained happiness. We treat our sometimes inevitable losses as failures in the battle of survival.

The great paradox is that it is in letting go, we receive. We find safety in unexpected places of risk. And those who try to avoid all risk, those who would try to guarantee that their hearts will not be broken, end up in a self-created hell” p.67

 

Dying is trusting in the catcher

“Dying is trusting in the catcher. To care for the dying is to say “Don’t be afraid. Remember that you are the beloved child of God. He will be with you when you make your long jump. Don’t try to grab him; he will grab you. Just stretch out your arms and hands and trust, trust, trust.” P.68

 

The heart as the source of our physical, emotional, intellectual, volitional and moral energies.

“A mystic of moods and feelings, Henri Nouwen claimed the heart as the source of our physical, emotional, intellectual, volitional, and moral energies. The way to God was only through the hear. He followed the teachings of the desert fathers who said that to enter the heart was to enter the kingdom of God. He liked to quote the Russian mystic Theopan the Recluse: “To pray is to descend with the mind into the heart, and there to stand before the face of the Lord ever present, all-seeing within you”. In “The Way of Heart” Nouwen writes

“From the heart arise unknowable impulses as well as conscious feelings, moods, and wishes. The heart too has its reasons and is the centre of perception and understanding. Finally, the heart is the seat of the will: it makes plans and comes to good decisions. Thus the heart is the central and unifying organ of our personal life”

No stranger to the paralyzing power of fear, Nouwen was not afraid, though, to share his vulnerability on the page, swiftly gaining respect as a tried and tested “wounded healer” who understand the complex dymanics of the human heart as the intimate core of personal experience and encounter with God. For him, insecurity was not simply an expression of neurosis but a vocation that could lead to a deep spiritual life. The challenge for Nouwen always revolved around the need to become so convinced of God’s love for him that human affirmations were not necessary. But it proved to be a lifelong battle.” P. 69

 

Nouwen was in favour of the role of solitude

“Like Merton, whose influence is always noticeable, Nouwen has an acute sense of calling and an openness to the process of conversion, not least through solitude, which is not a therapeutic retreat center in the country but a critical place where the old self can die and the new self can be born. It is where Christ remodels us in his own image and liberates us from the compulsions of the world. Solitude is the way in which we can grow into the realization that where we are most alone, we are most loved by God. It is a quality of the heart that helps us accept our aloneness as a divine gift. Then it becomes possible to convert the aloneness into deep solitude from where we can reach out to others. In this way, a healthy sense of community can be realized because people are not clinging to one another out of loneliness.”

“Loneliness is about feeling isolated and separate”, he said. “Solitude is about dealing with your aloneness in a positive way. You say “I feel alone but I am well. I claim my aloneness. I embrace it as a source of life” To speak about solitude is basically making a print of the negative which is loneliness. It’s a way of living and can take a lifetime. Every day I feel lonely again. Every moment that is new, I discover my loneliness into solitude. The whole spiritual life is a constant choice to let your negative spiritual experiences become an opportunity for conversion and renewal, whether it’s despair, doubt, loneliness, sexual confusion, or anger. We have to really look at these, not put them away and live virtuously. It’s much more like trusting that, if I embrace my loneliness, depression and struggle in faith that somewhere, in the middle, I find light and hope.

“In the world sadness and gladness are always separate. If you are sad, you cannot be glad. If you are glad you cannot be sad. We say “Be happy so we can forget all our troubles.” In the spiritual life it’s precisely the opposite. Sadness and gladness can never be separate. You embrace your sadness and trust that, right there, you will find gladness. That is what the cross is all about. You look at the cross, a sign of execution, pain and torture. But you say “Well, the cross is my hope. The cross is a source of life for me. The cross brings me joy.” By embracing the pan you are speaking about joy. That’s a very, very spiritual thing.” P 71

 

 

Nouwen taught that God is love

“A vibrant communicator of the Christian faith, Nouwen taught that the spiritual life was one guided by the Spirit of God, the same Spirit that had guided the life of Jesus. Spiritual discipline was the concentrated effort to create space where the Spirit of God could touch, guide, and lead people to unexpected places where they found themselves no longer in control. The core experience of Jesus’ public life was his baptism in the Jordan when he had heard the affirmation: “You are my beloved on whom my favour rests.” The entire life of Jesus had been about claiming that identity in the midst of everything. Prayer was about listening to the voice that called each person the beloved. It meant opening your heart in order to enter into communion with the one who loved you before you could love. This “first love” was disclosed to us in prayer. Nouwen believed we should go back time and again to that first love in which we were created, redeemed and made holy. As an act of returning, prayer was about constantly going back to the truth of our spiritual identity and claiming it for ourselves. That was the meaning of faith. A contemplative discipline required people to divest themselves of all false belongings and identities so that they could become free to belong to God and God alone. Each person was a different refraction of the same love of God, the same light of the world, coming toward us. “We can’t see God in the world”, he would say. “Only God can see God in the world. If I have discovered God as the center of my being, then the God in me recognises God in the world. Do we see God with our own eye that wants to please or control – or with God’s eye?

A preacher with a message independent of any theological movement, Nouwen believed the future of Western Christianity depended on the ability of people to live mystically The antithesis of any form of religious fundamentalism, this meant journeying by blind faith, not proseltyzing with shall certainties. The mystical life was one in which people could move away from illusion and through periods of darkness and doubt, grow into a true relationship with the divine. He said that when Christianity failed to claim the truth that everything was in God, it lost its transforming power and was little more than a series of moral obligations. And in order to thwart demonic manipulation, the spiritual life required people to practice a constant vigilance, deepening and enlivening the presence of God in their hearts.” P 73

 
 

 

 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 

 

 

Deconditioning the Mind – Antony de Mello

 

De Mello ways we need to become like Christ internally

“You know sometimes people want to imitate Christ but, when a monkey plays a saxophone, that doesn’t make him a musician. You can’t imitate Christ by imitating his external behaviour. You’ve got to be Christ. Then you’ll know exactly what to do in a particular situation, given your temperament, your character, and the character and temperament of the person you’re dealing with. No one has to tell you. But to do that you must be what Christ  was. An external limitation will get you nowhere.” P 103

 

De Mello is heavily influenced by Buddhism

“De Mello proposes a four-step guide to wisdom, which involves first getting in touch with negative feelings (such as self-hatred or guilt) we might not even be aware of. We have, then, to grasp the fact that the feeling is in us and not in reality. The third step is to stop identifying with the feeling that has nothing to do with the “I”. We should not define our intrinsic selves with any such feeling. We should say, “I am experiencing depression”, rather than “I am depressed”. The final step lies in recognising the need for change in ourselves rather than in others. We always want someone else to change, says de Mello, so that we will feel good. But we ourselves need to medicine. The mystics did not say “I feel good because the world is right” but “The world is right because I feel good.”

“De Mello insists we will feel more at ease with the people around us when we are no longer afraid of being hurt or not liked – or when we overcome the desire to impress or rid ourselves of the compulsion to explain or apologise. Nobody ever rejects us. They merely reject what they think we are. By the same token, nobody ever accepts us either. Asleep, they simply affirm the image they have constructed of us. Although being woken up is not always pleasant, it is easier to love others when we no longer identify with what we image they are or they imagine us to be.” P 106

 

The Path of True Happiness

“De Mello distinguishes between acquired happiness (material accumulation, academic success, career promotion, pleasures of body and mind, recognition and fame) and real happiness (a state of mind in which people experience peace, joy, contentment, love, compassion and thanksgiving – all in one). Acquired happiness is fleeting and as it passes from our grasp the thirst for more intensifies. It creates suffering in the form of frustration, depression, or even suicide. While happiness cannot be purchased with money or power, it can be experienced in the here and now as well as in eternity.” P 107

“He makes a careful distinction between pain and suffering. In life pain is inevitable, part of the process of living. But if people immunize themselves against all pain, they will never grow. Pain comes from the outside and is not of a person’s making. Suffering, on the other hand, arises from within and should be avoided and eliminated.” P 107

Suffering caused by attachment

 

“Suffering is caused by attachment which is the craving for possessing (or the craving for shunning) someone on something. As people expect to be happy according to their own models of happiness, attachment can manifest itself in two ways: in craving for a desire object like a new partner – or by craving to eliminate an undesired object. For example, “I like Jane but hate Juliette. I seek the company of Jane to make myself important”. That is attachment. But “I seek all means to push out Juliette because I hate her age and appearance” is also attachment in de Mello’s eyes because it implies that “I believe that I will be happy when I will have eliminated her (the undesired object).

People become programmed through attachments in the form of expectations toward oneself and toward others, and expectations of others toward oneself and toward one’s life. But in trying to find meaning in their lives in this way people become only restless and unsatisfied. What they are seeking is not happiness (joy, peace and contentment) but their own distorted idea of happiness, which they keep craving for through attachments. Developing the Ignatian principle of discernment, de Mello teaches that the way out of such psychological imprisonment is through self-observation and by being challenged. This leads to detachment. A detached person is free. There is joy in possessing the objects of a person’s desires but joy also when a person does not possess them. Success and failure can, therefore, be received with equal pleasure” p 109

 

Heavy influence from Buddhism

 

Also a need to recognise our humanity

“For de Mello, the more human you became, the more in touch you were with God. Searchers of the spiritual, haunted by the memory of disturbing religious imagery or oppressive preachers of their past, found solace in the reassuring waters of Anthony de Mello, who tossed overboard jargon that he felt had been overused or misused in religious upbringing” p 111

 

“De Mello was the ultimate nonfundamentalist but, at the same time, not a relativist. He was in search of the living God and came in touch with God through other people.” P.116

 

“According to de Mello, awareness leads to the inner discovery that everything has a beginning, a moment of becoming, and an end. The world is transitory and flows like a river. This inner realization creates a freedom that is the experience of true happiness, the crowning point of the spiritual life, causing a person to marvel at creation, wonder at beings and be grateful to God for his continuous grace. Salvation and freedom begin, then, in the here and now when life is celebrated as a wellspring of joy and love. Nothing really changes through enlightenment, but the world is seen through new eyes.” P 116

 

Religious beliefs and signposts

“A religious belief is a signpost pointing the way to the truth, remarks de Mello in one of his books. When you cling to the signpost, you are prevented from moving toward the truth because you think you have found it already” p 120

 

De Mello speaks prophetically into our age, using a language which is appealing to the non religious person

“Describing de Mello as a “fire-maker from the East”, Anand Nayak said that, far from being a danger to the church, he was a prophetic and mystical teacher whose works had brought immense help and healing to vast numbers. He incorporated religious concepts and themes into his teachings, not to fuel theological debate, but to help free people from fear and anguish “in order to lighten their burden created through imaginary and structural conditions and to give people a taste for life and a joy for living.” P 130

 

All will be well


Spirituality for Anthony de Mello was always a process of waking up, and his message of inner liberation could not be more germane to these times. He stresses that all mystics are united in the belief that all is ultimately well. “Though everything is a mess, all is well”, de Mello writes. “Strange paradox to be sure. But, tragically, most people never get to see that all is well because they are asleep. They are having a nightmare….” P 131

 

John O’Donohue

 

Donohue writes about the effect of modernity on our spirituality

“In the post-modern world the hunger to belong has rarely been more intense, more urgent. With many of the ancient traditional shelters now in ruins, it is as if society has lost the art of fostering community. Consumerism propels us towards an ever more lonely and isolated existence. As consumerism numbs our longing, our sense of belonging becomes empty and cold. And although technology pretends to unite us, more often than not all it delivers are simulated images that distance us from our lives. The “global village” has no roads or neighbours; it is a faceless, impersonal landscape from which all individuality has been erased. Our politicians seem devoid of imagination and inspiration, while many of the keepers of the great religious traditions now appear to be little more than frightened functionaries. In a more uniform culture, the management skills they employ would be efficient and successful. In a pluralistic and deeply fragmented culture, they are unable to speak to the complexity of our longings” p 139

 

Michael Ford on O’Donohue

 

“In his writings O’Donohue recognizes that the human soul is hugry for beauty, seeking it through landscape or the arts, companionship or religion. When we encounter the Beautiful, there is a sense of homecoming. We feel most alive in its presence because it meets the needs of the soul. In the experience of beauty, we awakes and surrender in the same act and become aware of the new ways of being in the world. The wonder of the Beautiful is its ability to surprise.

The Greek for “the beautiful” is to kalon, related to the world kalein, which includes the notion of “call”. O’Donahue says that when we experience beauty, we feel called to an awakening of a forgotten brightness. The beauty of the earth is a constant play of light and dark, the visible and the invisible, yet beauty is always more than the senses can perceive. Beauty awakens the soul, and its entrance is the imagination:


“When we bring in the notion of the imagination, we begin to discover a whole new sense of God. The emphasis on guilt, judgement and fear begins to recede. The image of God as a tabloid moral accountant peering into the regions of one’s intimate life falls away. The notion of the Divine Imagination brings out the creativity of God, and creativity is the supreme passion of God.”

This insight always needs to be balanced against the unknown in God, which remains “beyond the furthest dream of the mind’s light”. The creation of the world is not God’s desire for experimentation. On the contrary, like an artist, God follows his imagination and reaches towards expression:


“Everything that is – every tree, bird, star, stone and wave – existed first as a dream in the mind of the divine artist. Indeed, the world is the mirror of the divine imagination and to decipher the depths of the world is to gain deep insights into the heart of God. The traces of the divine imagination are everywhere. The beauty of God becomes evident in the beauty of the world.”

O’Donahue told me that he felt religion had become unpopular because, in its obsession with morality, rules and regulations, it had forgotten “the beauty of the mystical flame which is at the heart of it”. In ecological terms, he saw how so much modern development had desecrated the earth, turning it into a wasteland because there had been a failure to recognize the sheer beauty of nature. Beauty had become confused with glamour. Glamour was a multimillion dollar industry that thrived on dislocating or unhousing people from their own bodies and transferring all the longing toward the perfection of image. Glamour was insatiable because it lacked interiority. Beauty was a more sophisticated and substantial presence with an eternal heart – a threshold place where the ideal and the real touched each other. People on the bleakest frontiers of desolation, deprivation and povery were often sustained by small glimpses of beauty.

One of the deepest longings of the human heart, he said, was for real presence, the goal of trust, the ideal of love, and intentionality of prayer here and in the beatific vision herafter.” P 145-146

 

Modern society had become spiritually bankrupt

“Echoing Merton, O’Donahue critiqued modern society as a place where people appeared to inhabit the world of absence, rather than presence, because of technology and virtual reality. Its driven nature turned women and men into the ultimate harvesters of absence. They emerged as ghosts in their own lifetimes. The postmodern mind, particularly, was homeless, haunted by a sense of absence that it could neither understand nor transfigure. Many of the traditional shelters had collapsed. Religion, at least in its official presentation, seemed increasingly to speak in an idiom that was unable (or perhaps unwilling) to converse with the spiritual hunger of the age. Politics appeared devoid of vision and was becoming more and more synonymous with economics. Consumerist culture worshiped accumulation and power, arrogantly creating “its own hollow and gaudy hierarchies””. P 147


 

 

Book 4 - The Lost Message of Jesus – Steve Chalke published 2003 Zondervan

 

Brian McClaren observes in “A New Kind of Christian”

“Either Christianity is itself flawed, failing and untrue, or our modern, Western, commercialised, industrial-strength version of it is in need of a fresh look, a serious revision.” P 12

 

Jesus and the Kingdom

Hebrew scriptures anticipated three things

1)      Proper and full return from exile, with complete religions, social and political autonomy

2)      Rebuilding of temple so God could be fully back with his people

3)      Victorious defeat of Israel’s enemies

A good summary of N T Wright

 

However, Zealots and Essenes were groups that reacted to the situation in different ways. Zealots wanting conflict and Essenes retreating to Qumran.

Jesus’ reaction was very different:

“Jesus made it abundantly clear that he didn’t buy into any of the popular Kingdom movements. Instead his message was that the Kingdom of God was already operative through him (Matthew 11.1-19, Luke 4.16-30, 17.20-21) and that it was bigger and better than anyone had imagined. But by far the most shocking, outrageous and scandalous thing about his version of the Kingdom was that it wasn’t just a tribal God – the friend of the Jews and the punisher of Gentiles and pagans. He was the one, true God – the High God – the God of the whole earth. And his Kingdom was open to all humankind, a Kingdom of inclusion and acceptance, of forgiveness, and a new agenda for life. The heart of Jesus’ mission was simply this, “The Kingdom, the in-breaking shalon, of God is available now to everyone through me”” p 29

 

The story of the priest and the change in the boundary fence

“One of the most controversial aspects of Jesus’ message was that it moved all the fences. He redrew the boundaries of the Kingdom of God to include very definitely those who previously had been excluded. He blew away both the social and geographical limitations imposed by the pious Pharisees and other religious leaders as well as the hot-headed revolutionaries.” P.30

 

Pharisees, Zealots and Essenes

“The ideas that Pharisees, Zealots and Essenes had for the Kingdom of God were all well developed. Each group had constructed elaborate theological and social systems around their particular visions. But in the end the problem they all had to face up to was simply that they didn’t work. At the end of the day, each one was not only impotent in terms of dealing with the reality of life in first-century Palestine, but provided cold comfort for the ordinary people of Israel, for whom they offered little hope but huge burdens”. P 33

 

Jesus was creating a kingdom for the Kingdom of God now

“We live with the idea that the gospel’s chief aim is to make us fit for heaven, when in reality Jesus’ message is focused on making us citizens and recipients of the Kingdom of God today. Too often we present Christianity as a faith to die by, asking questions such as “If you were to die tonight, where do you think you would spend eternity?” However,  Jesus’ message is about a faith to live, love, work and play by today….As the Victorian preacher Charles Spurgeon put it, “A little faith will take you to heaven, but I pray for the kind of faith that will bring heaven to earth”” p.36

 

Marilyn Monroe “Money doesn’t buy you happiness, it just buys you a more expensive set of problems”

 

People misunderstand the gospel

 

“Many have understood the gospel as “God’s got a big stick and he’s on your case.” But what kind of message is that for the single parent struggling to bring up her child with inadequate resources? What kind of hope is that for the young teenager who has only known a life of abuse at the hands of those he should have been able to trust? What kind of liberation does that offer the lonely, the vulnerable, the cheated, the homeless, the forgotten, or the countless individuals, young and old, who suffer from an acute sense of failure or lack of self-esteem? What kind of good news is that for humanity as a whole? What popularly passes for “the gospel” might provide a faith to die by, but offers little hope to live by. And most worryingly of all, it bears scant resemblance to the message of Jesus” p 42

 

We need to find a gospel based on the simplicity of God’s love for us:

Karl Barth “Jesus loves me this I know, for the bible tells me so” was his greatest theological lesson

 

 

Augustine v Irenaeus – Western Church v Eastern Church

“To see humanity as inherently evil and steeped in original sin instead of inherently made in God’s image and so bathed in original goodness, however hidden it may have become, is a serious mistake. It is this grave error that has dogged the church in the West for centuries. In the fourth century Augustine developed his influential theology that the material world and everything in it was inherently evil and corrupt. This “fallenness” he said was like a virus, and in humans was passed on through the act of sexual intercourse and conception. So from the seeds of Augustine’s thinking the doctrine of original sin was born. However, the Eastern Church instead followed the teaching of Irenaeus, who believed that all people were God’s image-bearers and though flawed were, as he put it, like flowers in bud – slowly coaxed into full bloom by God’s love.

In the words of John Stott, perhaps we have been dogmatic about what we should be agnostic about and agnostic about what we should be dogmatic over” p 68-69

 

Chalke then goes into the context of the gospels

“Herod the Great – 37BC to 4 BC. Herod was never able to win popular acceptance as the true King of the Jews. He may have initiated the rebuilding of the Jerusalem temple, but he proved totally impotent when dealing with our foundational cultural, religious and economic issues facing the Jewish people – not least the continued presence of Rome in the region. In the eyes of the masses, therefore, Herod could lay no claim to be chosen by God. His power was founded on compromise with a pagan power. He was nothing but a worthless puppet of the Romans and therefore a hated man. The threat of revolution always hung heavily in the Palestinian air.

However, any power of Herod the Great paled before the might of Caesar Augustus (from which Herod derived his power in the first place). He has single-handedly turned what had become a rocky republic into the greatest and most famous empire of them all. As the establisher and sole leader of the Roman Empire (27BC – AD14) he developed what is called his “gospel” for the people, the good news according to Caesar: “Divine Augustus Caesar, son of god, imperator of land and sea, the benefactor and saviour of the whole world, has brought you peace.

Therefore it is a statement of political dynamite when the God of Israel sends his messenger Gabriel to announce that the true saviour of the world and the bringer of real peace, the shalom of God, is now present on earth (Luke 2.11,14) and that this is genuine good news for all the people. Both Matthew and Luke are making it abundantly clear that the birth of Jesus is a paradigm-shifting event. The gauntlet has been thrown down. From that moment there was a new contender vying for the title Saviour of the World!” p.72

 

There had been attempts to usurp the Roman rule before, for example if 164 BC

“The closest the people of Israel ever came to freedom was in 164 BC when on December 25th Judas Maccabaeus and a zealous band of accomplices ousted the tyrannical Syrian leader Antiochus Epiphanes and liberated the temple, cleansing and re-consecrating it. For nearly one hundred years Israel enjoyed independence under the rule of the Hasmoneans (the Priest King). But tragically even this turned out simply to be a mere historical blip – a rare breath of freedom. By 63 BC Rome had moved in, crushed whatever stood in their way, and seized power. Judas Maccabaeus, it turned out, was not the Messiah after all.

 

Chalke focusses on the Beatitudes as example of the new inclusion his kingdom is there to represent

“So why were the people in these categories blessed? The answer is simple: they were blessed because of God’s generosity. Put bluntly, the blessing of God comes to them not because of their condition but in spite of it. The beatitudes form a list of the categories of those who knew what it was to be shunned by the establishment. They were the spiritually destitute, not the spiritually capable. For them, Jesus’ message was a revolution in the truest sense of the word – from now on, these “lasts” would be counted as “firsts” ahead of those who were far too certain of their “righteousness” and religious credentials….If Jesus preached his Sermon on the Mount today, who would he add to his list? “God bless you who are lonely, ugly, old, anorexic, bullied, infertile, displaced, over-worked, redundant, underpaid, homeless, unemployed, abused – God’s Kingdom belongs to you”. And if he did, would the Church love him or hate him for it?” p 93

He writes about how he encountered a lesbian who felt that no church would welcome her p.94

 

God accepts us as we are, it is acceptance before repentance

“God accepts us as we are, without judgement or condemnation, and gradually, through his love and acceptance, draws us ever closer to our understanding and living out his shalom in our lives. In other words acceptance precedes repentance – not the other way round.” P 99

 

The Temple

“Although the temple was supposed to be a “house of worship for all nations” (Isaiah 56.7) and a place of inclusiveness and welcome for all, it had become the exact opposite. It had become a symbol of Jewish exclusiveness and discrimination – and as such it had to go!” p 107

 

The Prodigal Son parable also has deeper meaning

“The point Jesus was making is startingly clear: God’s attitude to the prodigals of Israel (the “sinners”) was completely different to that of the religious leaders (the older brother). The spittle of forgiveness was free and available at any time, for all who came seeking it. And though the parable of the Prodigal Son makes the point as plain as daylight, Jesus’ constant offering of “free forgiveness" out on the streets, and in the episode at the temple, said it louder than ever.” P 110

 

Chalke then spends a lot of time on the subject of non-resistance, quoting Gandhi and taking the illustration of Rosa Parkes. This is because he does not like having “violent” theology of the cross.

 

We need to be less judgemental about who is and who is not a Christian and where the dividing line is

“Fifty years ago in his classic work Mere Christianity C S Lewis wrote “The world does not consist of 100 per cent Christians and 100 per cent non-Christians. There are people who are slowly ceasing to be Christians though they do not yet call themselves so. There are people who do not accept the full Christian doctrine about Christ but who are so strongly attracted by him that they are his in a much deeper sense than they themselves understand. There are people in other religions who are being led by God’s secret influence to concentrate on those parts of their religion which are in agreement with Christianity and who thus belong to Christ without knowing it.” P 141

 

Many people moving towards Christ who might not even be aware that they are

“Many people who would never attach the label “Christian” to themselves are actually in the process of moving through the crowd closer to Jesus. The Church may have huge difficulty in even recognising that this process is taking place, but all the same, God is slowly and surely transforming their lives. Therefore the Church’s task is to pick up on this process and work with it rather than ignore it – to offer acceptance rather than rejection” p 145

 

We don’t know when we actually cross over the border from England into Wales or from non faith into faith

 

Being Born again need not be a conscious experience

“Dallas Willard makes the point that because we have all been born once we should all understand the universal and obvious truth it teaches, but the truth is that none of us can remember anything about it. Birth is real, indeed essential, but it is a process that begins long before it is complete, it happens without our conscious effort and, what’s more, it is some time before any of us is aware what has taken place.” P 149

 

Importantly

“We don’t hear another thing of Nicodemus until the end of John’s Gospel. Had he rejected Jesus’ challenge? Had he accepted it? Had he slipped through the net? Why doesn’t John tell us? Because for John, being born-again wasn’t the crisis we have made it. He knew Jesus was referring to an ongoing process – the journey of life that began much earlier and would continue over the years to come.” P 149

“The problem we as the Church have got ourselves into is that we have turned a perfectly valid way of becoming a Christian into the only way of becoming a Christian. The gospel has been reduced to a proposition – “Do you want to go to heaven when you die? Then take these simple steps and you will be guaranteed that desire”. Perhaps we need to take our fingers off the panic button and learn to value meaningful conversations about Jesus and his agenda for life rather than simply looking for conversions” p 152

 

He is more into a Christus Victor view of the Cross than a penal Substitionary one and his emphasis is more on the resurrection